What does UGC actually cost you per winning ad?
The invoice says per video. Your economics run per winner. Drag your numbers in:
Videos per month
8
Price per video
$175
Winner rate
2%
Defaults: $175 average creator rate, 2% of creatives become ads you'd scale. Usage rights, which typically add 50–150%, are not even counted here.
with human creators
$8,750
per winning creative
$1,400/mo buys 8 videos and a winner every 7 months.
same winner rate, pamba videos
$234
per winning creative
Your $1,400 budget would buy 299 of these at about $4.68 each in plan credits: more shots, same math. Posting from managed accounts is priced per account.
Run the real experiment instead
Free to start. No card, no brief, no creator to chase.
About the math
Where do the default numbers come from?
Market averages: human UGC creators quote roughly $100 to $500 per video before usage rights, and only a small share of creatives become winners you'd scale, commonly cited around 1 in 50. Drag the sliders to your own numbers; the math updates live.
What counts as a winning ad?
A creative you'd actually put budget behind: it holds attention past the hook and converts. Most creatives don't, which is why the per-winner cost, not the per-video cost, is the number that decides your economics.
How is Pamba's figure calculated?
It depends on the kind of video. Pick one above the result: a 4-slide slideshow is about 60 credits (about $0.60 at plan rates), a 15-second talking avatar video about $2.30 and a 30-second one about $4.70, from the same per-second credit rates the pricing page uses. Posting from managed accounts is priced separately, per account. The same winner rate applied to a much cheaper video is what collapses the cost per winner.
